Air Traffic Control Systems for Drones: Interesting Problems for Entrepreneurs #1

by Mike88Apr 24, 2015

Mike88
More by

Pitch your Startup, App or Hardware or post a Startup Event or Startup Job

Last year I wrote a post called 5 Real Problems That I Really Think Need Solving which was very popular.

One of our contributors Australian Entrepreneur and Inventor Ian Maxwell was on leave recently and started an Invention a day post while travelling. His posts have inspired me to update my Interesting Problems that I believe are great entrepreneurial opportunities.

So today I kick off a fortnight of Interesting Problems.

Air Traffic Control Systems For Drones.

The Problem:

No Government Air worthiness agency in their right mind is going to allow anyone to blindly fly their drone ferrying 6 packs and pizza around cities without some form of Air Traffic Control, collision detection and avoidance and either geo and/or height fencing (nor should they).

There are no existing systems that will offer this capability given the change in operation that will occur when using Drones in a large numbers in a city.

Existing Air Traffic Control (ATC) have big towers, big airfields, lots of people and extremely expensive and heavy equipment in both the aircraft and the ground stations.

It seems unlikely this infrastructure will be able to be replicated or utilised for Drones.

Existing ATC mode of operation assumes manned flight and assumes the pilots are going to co-operate with the tower and each other.

In order to have commercial drone flight in any meaningful way you need to be able to prevent them from killing people and each other and to co-ordinate their flights to avoid collision with each other, buildings, cars, people and (the elephant in the room) real aircraft.

Also for commercial drones to be used for deliveries, presumably they will need to travel a longer distance than the currently allowed “Line of Sight” distance.

They will also need to be largely autonomous otherwise they will need a full-time operator for each drone which would probably prevent their adoption on a large-scale due to cost.

Until these issues are solved in a meaningful way it seems unlikely FCC or other air worthiness authorities are going to allow high volume drone usage.

Likely Requirements:

  • Low cost – $100 per unit or less
  • Low Weight
  • Low Power Requirements
  • Sensing Range 1km
  • LIDAR/Radar/Ultrasonics
  • Air to Ground Avoidance
  • Air to Air avoidance
  • Obstacle Avoidance
  • Navigation
  • Flight Planning
  • Live Video back to operator
  • Geo & Altitude Fencing
  • Failsafe automatic Landing or return to base

Please discuss with me on Twitter @Mikenicholls88

Pitch your Startup, App or Hardware or post a Startup Event or Startup Job


About The Author
Mike88
Mike88
Mike Nicholls Australian Inventor + Entrepreneur working with a small team of engineers building prototypes from Inventions including two medical devices. Publishes Startup88.com and has assessed/reviewed +500 inventions and +200 startups in the last 3 years. Mentors Sydney Startups via Incubate and other incubators and helps members of the Australian Startup Community via the Startup88.com website with free publicity and advertising. Experience in numerous industries including Digital Publishing, Cloud Computing, Apps, Hardware, Aviation, Real Estate & Finance and Health/Medical Devices.
2 comments
safety mats
safety mats

Bathrick had a lot of good things to say about what’s going on locally in this burgeoning industry.  Mark noted that one of the first UAS companies to make significant inroads into this new industry is located right here in the Treasure Valley.