ReportArk

Company profile:

Startup name: ReportArk

Tagline: One review link for HTML reports

Elevator Pitch: ReportArk lets AI Agents publish HTML reports as a single review link. Reviewers leave comments anchored to evidence on the page, and that feedback flows into the next version instead of disappearing in chat threads.

Teams use it for pytest HTML, agent run logs, and customer-facing reports that need a shareable URL. Pricing is Freemium: Free, Lite at $99/year, and Pro at $190/year. Built by Skylance LLC.

Target Market: AI agent builders, engineering and QA teams who need to share HTML reports for review

How will you make money?: Freemium SaaS — Free tier plus Lite ($99/yr) and Pro ($190/yr)

How much capital have you raised?: None

Website: https://reportark.com

City/Country: Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States (Skylance LLC)

AI-assisted summary:

ReportArk is a hosted product for publishing finished HTML reports as browser-based review links, with an emphasis on reports produced by AI agents, scripts, and reporting tools rather than on creating the report content itself. (Source: https://reportark.com/)

The startup addresses a practical handoff problem: a report can be generated successfully but still be difficult to share, review, revise, or open correctly when it remains in a local workspace or is sent as a raw file package. (Source: https://reportark.com/)

The problem and target users

ReportArk targets people and teams that need to share completed interactive HTML deliverables, including audits, benchmarks, research comparisons, launch plans, client deliverables, test reports, and AI-agent outputs. (Source: https://reportark.com/features)

Its core use case is preserving a report’s HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, fonts, and in-report interactions instead of converting the work into a static PDF, screenshot deck, or fragile email attachment. (Source: https://reportark.com/features)

The company argues that raw HTML sharing can fail because email attachments may be blocked or constrained, report packages can lose linked assets, and opening a local file can create browser-environment issues for modules or data-loading behavior. (Source: https://reportark.com/blog/how-to-share-an-html-file)

The intended workflow is particularly relevant to AI-assisted operations: an agent may generate a finished analysis, but a local file path is not a useful delivery mechanism for a stakeholder who needs a browser-accessible report and a structured review loop. (Source: https://reportark.com/)

Product and key features

Users can upload either a standalone HTML file or a package containing an index.html entry point and related assets, then publish the result through a stable browser URL. (Source: https://reportark.com/)

ReportArk says its links can remain unchanged when the underlying report package is updated, allowing owners to revise content without redistributing URLs already shared in email, Slack, or tickets. (Source: https://reportark.com/features)

Viewing is link-based while commenting requires an approved signed-in account; comments can be pinned to a specific heading, table, chart, or finding, rather than being separated into a generic discussion thread. (Source: https://reportark.com/features)

Owners can add an optional password, pause sharing without deleting the report or its comments, and access an owner workspace with report previews and access summaries. (Source: https://reportark.com/features)

For automation-oriented teams, ReportArk offers an HTML-report-sharing Skill and scoped API keys intended to let agents or scripts upload reports, return a share link, and retrieve feedback with location and quoted context. (Source: https://reportark.com/skills)

Business model, pricing signals, and traction

ReportArk uses a freemium subscription model: its Free plan is listed at $0 with 20 MB per report, up to five retained reports, and 30-day report availability. (Source: https://reportark.com/pricing)

Its paid Lite plan is listed at $9.90 per month or $99 per year, while Pro is listed at $19 per month or $190 per year; paid tiers increase retained-report limits, storage, retained versions, and access-analytics history. (Source: https://reportark.com/pricing)

Every listed plan includes password sharing, comments, pause-sharing controls, and the HTML upload Skill, suggesting that ReportArk positions premium value around capacity, retention, versioning, and analytics rather than basic collaboration access. (Source: https://reportark.com/pricing)

Publicly available third-party information is limited: a SideProjectors listing for ReportArk was published on November 2, 2026 and describes the product as a way to share interactive HTML reports through one review link. (Source: https://www.sideprojectors.com/project/107090/reportark)

Expert take

ReportArk’s positioning is narrow but intelligible: it is not trying to replace general cloud storage, document collaboration suites, or website-hosting platforms; it is focused on the last mile between a completed HTML report and stakeholder review.

The strongest potential differentiator is the combination of stable hosted links, evidence-anchored comments, and agent/API workflow support. The main open questions for founders and investors are adoption, security requirements for sensitive reports, and whether this focused workflow can become a durable system of record rather than a useful delivery utility.

Note: Information based on publicly available sources at the time of writing, and summarized by AI.